1. Facts
The real estate fund known as Immo Real Estate Fund, headquartered in Geneva, is managed by Immo Management SA, headquartered in Geneva. As a contractual fund, it directly owns investment properties in the cantons of Geneva, Vaud, and Fribourg.
For organizational and economic reasons, it has been decided to change the fund manager and to entrust the management of the real estate portfolio held by Immo Real Estate Fund to a fund manager headquartered in the canton of Vaud named Profond Management SA.
However, before proceeding with this change in fund management service provider, we wish to analyze the tax implications of this transfer, as some argue that the change in fund management could trigger taxation in the form of transfer taxes (or registration fees in the canton of Geneva).
Question
- Will the change in fund management trigger taxation in the cantons of Geneva, Vaud, and Fribourg?
1. Facts
The real estate investment fund named Pro Invest Real Estate, headquartered in Zurich, owns real estate in the canton of Geneva. As part of the intercantonal allocation of taxable items, the fund reports the properties at their book value in its tax return. Thus, the properties are reported at a value of CHF 219,000,000 in the canton of Geneva, thereby generating a share of taxable equity in the canton of Geneva of approximately CHF 152,000,000 out of a total of CHF 348,000,000.
In subsequent years, the method for the intercantonal allocation of taxable items was applied according to the same scheme. However, the Canton of Geneva determined that the values relevant for capital tax were derived from tax values rather than book values, thereby resulting in an increase in the taxable bases in the Canton of Geneva as follows:
- For 2012, a tax value of real estate of CHF 248,000,000 instead of CHF 219,000,000, resulting in an increase in the capital tax base to CHF 176,000,000 instead of CHF 152,000,000;
- For the year 2013, a tax value of real estate in the Canton of Geneva of CHF 259,000,000 instead of CHF 227,000,000, resulting in a capital tax calculated on CHF 183,000,000 instead of CHF 150,000,000.
A similar adjustment was made for the 2014 and 2015 tax periods, resulting in an increase of several tens of millions in the tax base each time.
Question
- Can the tax values calculated by the Canton of Geneva under its cantonal law be used for capital tax purposes?
1. Facts
Simon, a resident of the Canton of Vaud, is a shareholder of a real estate company named Immo Valio SA, headquartered in the Canton of Vaud. The company owns real estate located in the cantons of Fribourg, Vaud, and Geneva. Simon is approached by a real estate SICAV headquartered in Geneva that is interested in purchasing part of Immo Valio SA’s real estate portfolio, specifically the following properties:
- A building located in the city of Fribourg for CHF 2,000,000, with a tax-determined book value of CHF 1,200,000;
- Two buildings in the canton of Vaud with a total market value of CHF 8,000,000 and a book value of CHF 2,000,000;
- Two properties in the canton of Geneva with a market value of CHF 12,000,000 and a book value of CHF 3,000,000.
However, the real estate SICAV does not wish to pay for all the properties with cash, but intends to proceed via an asset swap and a partial cash payment, which will allow it to cover any tax costs associated with this transaction.
Questions
- What is the tax treatment of the real estate exchange for Immo Valio SA?
- What are the tax consequences for the real estate SICAV?
Alternative
Immo Valio SA therefore receives shares worth CHF 10,000,000. The value of the shares issued by the real estate SICAV in connection with the purchase of the properties amounted to CHF 200, for a total of 50,000 shares.
Questions
- What is the tax treatment of the returns paid by the real estate SICAV to Immo Valio SA?
- What is the tax treatment if Immo Valio SA sells the shares for CHF 250 each, generating a capital gain of CHF 2,500,000?
1. Facts
The contractually organized investment fund named Swiss German Real Estate is headquartered in the canton of Zurich. It is a mixed REIT.
It owns three recently acquired real estate companies in the canton of Vaud, which hold three rental properties located in Morges. These three real estate companies, named SI Rue du Marché 7, SI Rue du Marché 9, and SI Rue du Marché 11, are in fact contiguous properties.
The real estate fund therefore wishes to merge them to simplify the structure and reduce costs.
Each of the properties owned by the SI companies has the following tax assessments:
- Rue du Marché 7: tax valuation of CHF 9,000,000;
- Rue du Marché 9: tax assessment of CHF 11,000,000;
- Rue du Marché 11: tax assessment of CHF 10,000,000.
In addition, the Swiss German Real Estate REIT also owns four properties in Lausanne, with a combined tax assessment of CHF 30,000,000.
Questions
- Does the merger have an impact on the supplementary real estate tax?
- With regard to directly held properties, is it logical for the Swiss German Real Estate Fund to pay the supplementary real estate tax?